Delhi’s Saket Court Convicts Five in 2014 Attempted Murder Case
On October 10, Delhi’s Saket Court found five individuals guilty in a case of attempted murder that occurred on the night of December 31, 2014. The incident took place in the Saket area following a dispute between the accused and two other men. Additional Sessions Judge Vishal Pahuja convicted Karan alias Kannu, Karan alias Kalyan, Suraj, Himanshu, and Amit under sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court relied on the consistent testimonies of three eyewitnesses, including the victim Pushkar, to reach its verdict. Judge Pahuja stated that the evidence presented was convincing and left no room for doubt. The court dismissed the defense’s claims of false implication, noting that there was no evidence of police misconduct.
The defense argued inconsistencies in witness testimonies and procedural lapses, such as the lack of call detail records and CCTV footage. However, the court maintained that minor contradictions did not undermine the core of the prosecution’s case. The court emphasized that the eyewitness accounts were sufficient to establish the accused’s involvement, even without the recovery of the weapon used.
The case will continue on October 21 for further legal proceedings. The victim, Pushkar Singh Nihal, was hospitalized on January 1, 2015, with stab wounds, and the attack was witnessed by his brother, Anand Singh. An FIR was filed, leading to the arrest of the accused.
Doubts Revealed
Saket Court -: Saket Court is a court located in the Saket area of Delhi, India. Courts are places where legal cases are heard and decided by judges.
Convicts -: Convicts are people who have been found guilty of a crime by a court. In this case, five people were found guilty of trying to murder someone.
Attempted Murder -: Attempted murder means trying to kill someone but not succeeding. It’s a serious crime because it involves harming someone with the intention to end their life.
Eyewitness Testimonies -: Eyewitness testimonies are statements given by people who saw the event happen. These statements help the court understand what happened during the incident.
Procedural Lapses -: Procedural lapses refer to mistakes or errors in the way the legal process is carried out. The defense claimed there were such mistakes, but the court did not agree.
Recovery of the Weapon -: Recovery of the weapon means finding the weapon used in the crime. In this case, the weapon was not found, but the court still had enough evidence to convict the accused.
