Delhi High Court Seeks Response from Delhi University on LLB Admission Plea by Sumit Kumar Singh and Anany Rathore

Delhi High Court Seeks Response from Delhi University on LLB Admission Plea by Sumit Kumar Singh and Anany Rathore

Delhi High Court Seeks Response from Delhi University on LLB Admission Plea

The Delhi High Court has asked Delhi University to respond to a plea filed by two LLB aspirants, Sumit Kumar Singh and Anany Rathore, who are seeking admission. The students claim that despite the conclusion of the admission process, there are still vacant seats available.

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav issued a notice to the university and has sought a response on the petition. The matter has been listed for hearing on November 5.

The petitioners, represented by Advocates Shakti Pandey and Gaurav Arora, have requested the university to fill the vacant seats in the LLB program and to reserve two seats for them during the pendency of the petition.

Both students are meritorious candidates who appeared for the Common University Entrance Test (CUET (PG) 2024) conducted by the National Testing Agency on March 13, 2024, and each secured a score of 176 marks in the ‘General (LLB, etc.)’ category.

Despite meeting the cutoff criteria and the availability of vacant seats in all three law centers of the Faculty of Law, the petitioners were unjustly denied admission. The university conducted four rounds of spot admissions, with the last round having cutoffs of 177 for Campus Law Centre and 176 for Law Centre I and Law Centre II. The petitioners, with their scores of 176, met the cutoff for Law Centre I and Law Centre II but were excluded from the admission process.

The petitioners approached the grievance redressal cell of the university multiple times, highlighting the non-allocation of seats despite meeting the cutoff marks, but their pleas were ignored. The petition states that the university failed to fulfill its declared vacancy positions in the various Spot Admission Rounds, thereby denying eligible candidates their rightful opportunity for admission.

According to the petition, there is a significant discrepancy between the number of seats declared vacant and the number of admissions actually offered. For example, Campus Law Centre declared 27 vacant seats in Spot Round-IV but admitted only 23 students, Law Centre-I had 51 vacant seats in Spot Rounds III and IV but admitted only 32 students, and Law Centre-II had 69 vacant seats in Spot Rounds I, II, and III but admitted only 40 students.

The petitioners argue that this failure to fill declared vacancies is a fundamental breach of the university’s duties and a violation of the legitimate expectations of qualified candidates.

Doubts Revealed


Delhi High Court -: The Delhi High Court is a big court in Delhi, India, where important legal cases are decided.

Delhi University -: Delhi University is a famous university in India where many students go to study different subjects.

LLB -: LLB stands for Bachelor of Laws, which is a degree you need to become a lawyer.

plea -: A plea is a request made to a court asking for a specific decision or action.

aspirants -: Aspirants are people who are trying to achieve a goal, like getting into a university.

cutoff -: A cutoff is the minimum score you need to get in an exam to be eligible for something, like admission to a course.

vacant seats -: Vacant seats are empty spots available for students in a course or class.

CUET (PG) 2024 -: CUET (PG) 2024 is an entrance exam for postgraduate courses in universities.

petitioners -: Petitioners are people who bring a request or complaint to a court.

hearing -: A hearing is a meeting in a court where people discuss and decide on legal matters.

reserve -: To reserve means to keep something aside for a specific person or purpose.

pendency -: Pendency means the time during which a legal case is still being decided.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *