Delhi Court Upholds Decision Against FIR in Matrimonial Dispute

Background

In New Delhi, a legal case involving Vikramjeet Rana and his wife, along with her family, was brought before the Saket Court. The case revolved around a request for the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against Rana's wife and her family members.

Court's Decision

The court, led by Additional Sessions Judge Purshottam Pathak, dismissed the revision plea filed by Vikramjeet Rana. The court upheld the previous decision made by a magistrate, which also refused to direct the registration of an FIR.

Judicial Reasoning

Judge Pathak emphasized that issuing directions for an FIR is a serious judicial exercise that requires careful consideration of the facts and circumstances. It cannot be done casually or mechanically. The court stated that such directions are only warranted when there is clear evidence of a cognizable offense that requires thorough investigation.

Case Details

Rana had accused his wife and her family of threatening and assaulting him. Despite filing a complaint at the Saket Police Station, no action was taken, leading him to seek court intervention. However, the magistrate dismissed his application on December 15, 2023.

Arguments

Rana's counsel argued that the trial court overlooked crucial evidence and failed to issue necessary directions for investigation under section 307 (Attempt to murder) of the IPC. Conversely, the respondents' counsel maintained that the magistrate's decision was well-reasoned and did not require police investigation.