Verdict on Varanasi Gyanvapi Mosque Case to be Announced on October 25

Verdict on Varanasi Gyanvapi Mosque Case to be Announced on October 25

Verdict on Varanasi Gyanvapi Mosque Case to be Announced on October 25

The long-standing case concerning the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, is set to reach a verdict on October 25. This case, which has been ongoing since 1991, involves a dispute between the Hindu side, represented by lawyer Vijay Shankar Rastogi, and the Muslim side, represented by the Anjuman Intezamiya Committee and the Waqf Board.

The Hindu side has requested permission to build a temple and grant the right to worship within the Gyanvapi premises. The Muslim side completed their arguments on October 8, and the Hindu side has submitted several precedents from the High Court and Supreme Court to support their case.

The case has been pending for 33 years, and the recent completion of arguments marks a significant step towards a resolution. The court’s decision will address the construction of a new temple and the rights of worship within the Gyanvapi complex.

Doubts Revealed


Verdict -: A verdict is a decision made by a judge or a court about a legal case. It tells us who wins the case and what actions will be taken.

Varanasi -: Varanasi is a city in India, known for its religious significance to Hindus. It is one of the oldest cities in the world and is located on the banks of the River Ganges.

Gyanvapi Mosque -: The Gyanvapi Mosque is a mosque located in Varanasi. It is at the center of a legal dispute between Hindus and Muslims regarding religious rights and temple construction.

Anjuman Intezamiya Committee -: The Anjuman Intezamiya Committee is a group that manages the Gyanvapi Mosque. They represent the Muslim side in the legal case.

Waqf Board -: The Waqf Board is an organization that manages properties and places of worship for Muslims in India. They are involved in the Gyanvapi Mosque case.

Precedents -: Precedents are past court decisions that are used as examples or rules in similar future cases. They help judges make fair decisions based on what has been decided before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *