Site icon Reveal Inside

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea to Stop Arms Exports to Israel During Conflict

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea to Stop Arms Exports to Israel During Conflict

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea to Stop Arms Exports to Israel During Conflict

Representative image

New Delhi, India – On Monday, the Supreme Court of India dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought to stop the Indian government from granting licenses for the export of arms and military equipment to Israel during the Israel-Palestine conflict.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra stated that the court could not interfere with national policy and decisions made by the government. The bench emphasized that such matters fall within the domain of foreign policy, which is beyond the court’s jurisdiction.

The court noted that granting the requested reliefs would require it to make findings on allegations against Israel, an independent sovereign nation not subject to Indian court jurisdiction. It added that such actions could lead to breaches of contracts between Indian companies and international entities.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the petitioners, argued that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that India should not allow exports that could be used for such purposes. He claimed that allowing these exports would violate the Genocide Convention, which India has ratified.

Chief Justice Chandrachud responded with a hypothetical example, questioning whether the court could direct the government to stop importing oil from Russia amidst the Russia-Ukraine war. He emphasized that such decisions are matters of foreign policy and national interest, which must be evaluated by the government.

The plea, filed by 11 individuals including retired civil servant Ashok Kumar Sharma, argued that exporting arms to Israel violates India’s international obligations and constitutional principles. The petition named several companies, including Munitions India Limited, Premier Explosive, and Adani Defence and Aerospace Ltd., as having been granted licenses for such exports.

The petitioners urged that India should ensure that weapons already delivered to Israel are not used to commit genocide or violate international humanitarian law. They called for the immediate suspension of military aid to Israel to prevent further violations.

Doubts Revealed


Supreme Court -: The Supreme Court is the highest court in India. It makes important decisions about laws and justice.

Plea -: A plea is a request made to a court asking for a specific action or decision.

Arms Exports -: Arms exports refer to selling or sending weapons and military equipment to other countries.

Israel -: Israel is a country in the Middle East. It has been in conflict with Palestine for many years.

Conflict -: A conflict is a serious disagreement or fight, often involving armed forces.

Chief Justice DY Chandrachud -: Chief Justice DY Chandrachud is the head judge of the Supreme Court of India.

Foreign Policy -: Foreign policy is how a country interacts with other countries, including decisions about trade, war, and peace.

Jurisdiction -: Jurisdiction means the official power to make legal decisions and judgments.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan -: Advocate Prashant Bhushan is a well-known lawyer in India who often takes up public interest cases.

Genocide -: Genocide is the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation.

Gaza -: Gaza is a small region on the eastern coast of the Mediterranean Sea, part of the Palestinian territories.

International Law -: International law is a set of rules and agreements that countries follow in their interactions with each other.

Military Aid -: Military aid is help given by one country to another in the form of weapons, equipment, or training for their armed forces.
Exit mobile version