Site icon Reveal Inside

Delhi Court Discharges Accused in Rape Case Due to Contradictory WhatsApp Evidence

Delhi Court Discharges Accused in Rape Case Due to Contradictory WhatsApp Evidence

Delhi Court Discharges Accused in Rape Case

A recent ruling by a Delhi Court has led to the discharge of an accused in a rape case. The decision was based on evidence, particularly WhatsApp chats, that contradicted the prosecution’s claims. The case involved allegations of forceful sexual assault by the complainant, who had been in a consensual relationship with the accused after a marriage proposal was made through a mutual relative.

Arguments and Evidence

Advocate Shashank Dewan, representing the accused, argued that the relationship was consensual and without a commitment to marriage. He highlighted that the WhatsApp chats between the two did not support the allegations of assault. Dewan also pointed out the significant delay in filing the FIR, which was registered five months after the alleged incident, casting doubt on the claims.

Incident Details

The alleged incident occurred in November 2020, when the complainant claimed she was assaulted in a parked car. However, the case was filed only in April 2021. The court noted that the WhatsApp messages from the day of the alleged assault showed cordial relations, contradicting the claims.

Court’s Conclusion

The court concluded that the evidence did not raise significant suspicion about the accused’s involvement. The delay in filing the FIR and lack of supporting evidence led the court to find the allegations highly improbable, resulting in the discharge of the accused.

Doubts Revealed


Delhi Court -: A Delhi Court is a place where legal cases are heard and decided in the city of Delhi, which is the capital of India.

Discharges Accused -: When a court ‘discharges’ an accused, it means the person is released from the charges against them because there isn’t enough evidence to prove they did something wrong.

Rape Case -: A rape case involves a serious crime where someone is accused of forcing another person to have sexual relations without their consent.

Contradictory WhatsApp Evidence -: This means that the messages exchanged on WhatsApp between the people involved showed information that did not match or supported the claims made by the person accusing someone of a crime.

Prosecution -: The prosecution is the legal team that tries to prove in court that the accused person committed the crime.

Consensual Relationship -: A consensual relationship is when two people agree to be in a relationship together, meaning both of them want to be together.

Advocate Shashank Dewan -: An advocate is a lawyer who represents someone in court. Shashank Dewan is the name of the lawyer who argued in favor of the accused person in this case.

FIR -: FIR stands for First Information Report. It is a document prepared by the police when they receive information about a crime.
Exit mobile version